"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/05/2016 at 20:58 • Filed to: None | 4 | 9 |
Nibby
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/05/2016 at 23:10 | 2 |
gimme
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Nibby
12/05/2016 at 23:26 | 0 |
no mine
Nibby
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/06/2016 at 08:31 | 0 |
ok fine, dibs on the silver spur though
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Nibby
12/06/2016 at 09:24 | 0 |
Fair enough.
theuserformerlyknownasaluminumfoil
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/06/2016 at 09:45 | 1 |
I remember when Clarkson took this on the Test Track and destroyed the rear tires.. it’s a gorgeous piece though.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> theuserformerlyknownasaluminumfoil
12/06/2016 at 10:00 | 0 |
It is. And with a bajillion lb-ft of torque (774lb-ft) it’s not hard to destroy said rear tires.
dtg11 - is probably on an adventure with Clifford
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/06/2016 at 16:50 | 1 |
Unrelated question: what video editing program do you use for your dashcam videos?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> dtg11 - is probably on an adventure with Clifford
12/06/2016 at 16:52 | 1 |
That is indeed unrelated. I just use iMovie which is why they look like an 8th grade video project.
dtg11 - is probably on an adventure with Clifford
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/06/2016 at 16:54 | 1 |
If it works, it works. Oh, and I love the Brooklands.